BY TOM WALDRON
ARTWORK BY KIRK CALDWELL
A New Maryland Health Insurance Initiative,
Relying on the School's Expert Advise, Offers One Solution To A
Desperate National Problem
Huddled around a Baltimore conference table covered with reports
and statistics, a dozen health policy experts hash through the tricky
final details of an insurance proposal.
Three faculty members from the School are key voices during the
intense five-hour session as the group searches for consensus on
question after question.
If the state of Maryland launches a new health insurance program,
how many of the state's half-million uninsured will enroll in the
first year? How many will be below the poverty line, how many in
the middle class? Will they be in their healthy twenties, or their
For much of the last year, marathon meetings like this one have
commanded the time and energy of several School faculty and a handful
of students who have been struggling with hundreds of such questions
as they confront a complicated and vexing problem: how to provide
universal health care coverage in the state of Maryland.
There's nothing theoretical about the work.
The group's recommendations, hammered out with colleagues from
the University of Maryland Law School, Georgetown University, and
other nonprofit groups, form the basis of legislation that the Initiative
hopes will be introduced in the Maryland General Assembly. On the
table is a proposed billion-dollar health insurance program financed
by existing government funds, enrollees, a tobacco tax, and possibly
employers that aims to provide coverage for every Marylander who
now lacks insurance.
In the seven years since Bill and Hillary Clinton's national health
plan failed miserably, Congress has largely steered clear of proposals
to help the nation's estimated 44 million uninsured. Tired of waiting,
several states have recently launched their own reforms and some,
among them Massachusetts and Maine, have flirted with universal
Should it pass, the ambitious reform package would likely take
Maryland now ranked only 26th among the states in the percentage
of its residents who have insurance to the top of the list nationally.
Making that happen may require a wholesale change in the way policy
makers and the public think about health care, says Laura Morlock,
PhD, a professor of Health Policy and Management who helped develop
"In the United States, access to education is considered not only
a right but an obligation," Morlock says. "But we have not had the
same thinking about health care."
At best, supporters say, it will take a couple of years for the
legislature to approve the full plan. But after three years of painstaking
groundwork, leaders of the effort believe their organization a
coalition of thousands of grassroots groups advised by top policy
experts - represents the best hope of upending the status quo to
achieve landmark reform of Maryland's patchwork health system.
One thing is absolutely clear. "We have set a train in motion that
something will happen," says Vincent DeMarco (a 1979 Hopkins Arts
and Sciences graduate), the executive director of the coalition
pushing the legislation. "Who knows what it will be. But something
estimate that half a million Marylanders are not covered by health
One of them is Sharon Little.
The 48-year-old resident of West Baltimore makes a modest living
caring for elderly people in their homes putting her squarely
in the "gray area" of health care. She doesn't qualify for Medicaid,
the state and federally funded insurance program. And she can't
come close to affording a private policy. So, for years she has
gone without coverage.
In 1998, Little discovered the harsh consequences as she began
suffering with persistent vaginal bleeding. Some days it was so
severe that she would nearly pass out. But Little didn't consider
surgery an option. "I just could not afford it," she says.
Little finally found help at the Shepherd's Clinic, a Baltimore
facility in a former bank building that relies on contributions
and volunteer physicians and nurses to provide primary and secondary
care for the uninsured. The clinic (founded by William H. M. Finney
MD, MPH '90) arranged for her surgery at Baltimore's Union Memorial
"If I hadn't been led to that clinic, I don't know what I would
have done," Little says.
Peter L. Beilenson, MPH '90, the health commissioner in Baltimore,
was all too familiar with stories like Little's, many of which he
concluded could be traced to a lack of insurance coverage. So in
1998, Beilenson called a meeting of health care advocates to discuss
the problem. Three years later, that initial gathering has blossomed
into a well-funded, grassroots organization with an ambitious agenda
that relied in large measure on advice from School faculty.
Known as the Maryland Citizens' Health Initiative, the group held
public meetings around the state to hear directly from the uninsured.
Its advisory panel of experts met with "stakeholders" to discuss
financial and administrative concerns. And the experts thrashed
through the nitty-gritty of health insurance during a series of
closed-door meetings. "Every time we think we have an issue solved,
it just metamorphoses," says Professor Jonathan P. Weiner, DrPH
'81, another of the Health Policy and Management faculty members
involved. "You could have hundreds of people working on this and
it wouldn't be enough."
What emerged this fall is a proposal for a quasi-public entity,
the Maryland Healthcare Trust, that would offer insurance to anyone
in the state who is not currently covered.
A key plank of the proposal would make Maryland the first state
to require all residents to obtain health coverage. Without that
requirement, the trust could end up enrolling a disproportionate
number of Marylanders with serious health problems, eventually bankrupting
the plan. The health care trust would provide a comprehensive set
of insurance benefits, as well as such extras as dental care and
hearing aids, with modest co-pays and no deductibles.
Adhering to the "build-it-and-they-will-come" philosophy, the planners
hope Marylanders will flock to what is expected to be an affordable
and efficient health insurer. "Our vision is to cover, at first,
only the uninsured," Weiner says. "But that eventually it will be
so good that others will want to come in."
But the Hopkins team is also the first to acknowledge that the
program will need fine-tuning.
"It is very unlikely we will get it entirely right, because there
are so many variables," says Morlock, who helped design the benefits
package. Outlining a new plan is one thing. Paying for it is much
trickier. The new insurance fund will have an annual price tag of
about $800 million in its early years, and eventually about $1.4
billion if the group reaches its goal of enrolling 90 percent of
the state's uninsured.
The coalition is proposing a wide-ranging financing package that
relies on an increase in the state tobacco tax, federal matching
funds, and premiums assessed on a sliding scale. Another source
would be about $150 million in government and other funds that now
go to non-profit groups providing care for the uninsured.
The Initiative also hopes to tap into nearly half a billion dollars
in payments that now go to hospitals to cover their costs for caring
for the uninsured. In Maryland's unique rate-setting system, all
consumers and insurance companies pay charges that are inflated
to account for these costs. Theoretically, if all Marylanders had
health insurance, hospitals would no longer need to be compensated
for their uninsured patients, freeing that money to subsidize the
new health care trust.
"Part of the issue is getting people to make
on the bus"
Professor Jonathan Weiner
The current system of hospital subsidies "makes no sense from a
public health perspective," Weiner says. "Why not use that money
to provide some preventive medicine?"
Finally, many of the Initiative's leaders support the imposition
of a new payroll tax on businesses that do not provide health insurance
for their employees.
While there is widespread agreement that Maryland must address
its uninsured problem, there will also be widespread opposition
to many of the plan's key planks.
For example, increasing any taxes, even on cigarettes, has proven
to be difficult time and again in Annapolis. Some conservative and
libertarian-minded legislators, meanwhile, will surely be hostile
to the group's groundbreaking proposal to require all Marylanders
to obtain insurance. Why should a healthy, young 20-something with
no spouse or children be forced to pay for insurance he doesn't
want? And the idea of tapping into the hospitals' uncompensated
care payments is, according to one of the Initiative's advisers,
"a very delicate issue."
Hospitals will be reluctant to change the current financing system,
and some lawmakers may object to a proposal that would essentially
transfer revenue generated by artificially inflated premiums charged
of some Marylanders into a fund to subsidize rates for others.
Weiner has no illusions about the difficulty of selling the ambitious
proposal. "If you ask the middle class if they want universal insurance
funded, they say, 'fine,'" Weiner says. "But if you go ask them
to give up a little of theirs, no way! Part of the issue is getting
people to make room on the bus."
The push for universal health care in Maryland began three and a half
years ago in a second-floor conference room in the Baltimore Health
Department's modest downtown headquarters. After more than five years
as Baltimore's health commissioner, Beilenson had grown tired of dealing
piecemeal with the city's thorny health care problems. Frustrated,
the city health commissioner convened a meeting with about a dozen
"progressive, good-guy folks" to think big.
"The entire system is so inequitable and we were applying band-aids
all over the place. We needed more comprehensive, true reform,"
he says. "The only way to do that was to make sure everyone had
adequate, affordable coverage."
A lanky marathon runner, Beilenson watched in amazement as the
idea took hold. Dozens of people attended the second brainstorming
session, and the group kept growing.
Early in 1999, Beilenson turned to DeMarco, a veteran organizer,
to run the Initiative. A lawyer by training, DeMarco has won high-profile
Maryland State House battles to secure passage of gun control laws
and a 30-cent increase in the state tax on a pack of cigarettes.
On both the gun control and tax issues, the genial but politically
savvy DeMarco used the same general strategy: develop grassroots
support and force politicians to take a stand while they run for
office. Then hold them to their pledges once the legislative debate
Working out of a cramped second-floor office in Baltimore's Charles
Village neighborhood, DeMarco is attempting the same thing with
universal health care, only on a bigger scale.
DeMarco and Beilenson secured grants from a dozen foundations totaling
more than $1.1 million, an unheard-of amount for a non-profit campaign.
Volunteers and paid staff fanned out across Maryland and secured
support for universal health insurance at least in general terms
from a staggering collection of more than 2,100 organizations,
ranging from the tiny Frostburg Homemakers Club in Allegany County
to the politically powerful state AFL-CIO.
By the middle of 2000, with grassroots support assured, the group
was ready to begin drafting a concrete proposal. DeMarco and Beilenson's
first stop was to see Dean Alfred Sommer, whose faculty had played
an important role in DeMarco's earlier legislative victories on
gun control and the cigarette tax. Says Beilenson, "Coming from
the preeminent public health school in the world gives [the proposal]
Donald M. Steinwachs, PhD, chairman of the Department of Health
Policy and Management, assembled a faculty team with expertise in
financing, health care delivery, administration, and politics.
Morlock and assistant professor Hugh Waters, PhD, worked on the
benefits package, crafting a plan with comprehensive but still relatively
affordable benefits. Weiner worked with associate professor Thomas
R. Oliver, PhD, on the administrative end of the proposed system.
Oliver helped draw up a structure for the governing board and looked
at how the new health care trust would interact with existing health
insurers. Weiner concentrated on such issues as reimbursement rates
for providers, cost-containment, and delivery of services to patients.
Professor David S. Salkever, PhD, concentrated on financing looking,
for example, at how to tap into the money now used to pay for hospital
costs for the uninsured. Faculty from the University of Maryland
and Georgetown, as well as advocates from nonprofit health groups,
also took part.
The School's faculty say they are pleased to play a role in attempting
to reform Maryland's health care system. "It's very exciting for
me; this is what I work for," Waters says. "It's exciting in the
sense of making some changes in Maryland, and being able to contribute
to the national debate."
The initiative's decision to
drop the single-player
plan drew criticism from
the left and the right.
Among the world's 28 industrialized countries, only three do not
have national health insurance: Mexico, Turkey, and the United States.
Yet America spends far more on health care than any other country
and still has worse health statistics in some areas.
"Talking about basic things like access to care and health outcomes,
we don't compare favorably," says Waters, who has worked on public
health projects in several developing countries. "It's an area of
major concern for any thoughtful person." Many experts predict that
the U.S. will eventually adopt a single-payer system, merging all
current health plans into one overseen by the government, something
akin to the federal Medicare program for the elderly.
Early on, Beilenson and his group figured Maryland could lead the
way by providing universal insurance through a first-of-its-kind,
single-payer system within the state's borders. The coalition even
hired a national consulting firm, which produced a predictably favorable
report suggesting that such a system would save the state more than
$200 million a year in insurance costs.
But building the necessary support for such a proposal proved impracticable.
Several left-leaning groups, including politically powerful trade
and teacher unions, wanted no part of a single-payer system. While
it sounded good in the abstract, union leaders concluded it would
either cost their members money or mean a reduction in their own
health benefits. "They said, 'Yeah it's a good idea, but don't force
me off my plan,'" DeMarco says.
Perhaps even more important, organizers concluded that with George
W. Bush in the White House, the federal government would not approve
waivers necessary to create a single-payer system in Maryland. "I'll
be the first to say that single payer is the most equitable, effective
way of providing health insurance," Beilenson says. "I love tilting
at windmills, but it's just not politically practical now."
December 2000, the coalition announced it would not be advocating
a single-payer plan. Rather, it would attempt to add on to the current
system a collection of private plans and government programs such
as Medicare and Medicaid.
The decision generated criticism, from both the left and the right.
Business groups remain convinced that the coalition's ultimate goal
is a single-payer system, which could force them to go into a government
system that could prove more expensive.
On the other side, single-payer advocates, both in and outside
the School, were outraged when the idea was scrapped. While they
acknowledge that a move to universal coverage in Maryland would
provide relief to the uninsured here, inequities would remain. Some
Marylanders, for example, would likely still end up paying too much
for coverage, while others would be stuck with low-end benefits
packages provided by penny-pinching employers.
Some argued it was better to do nothing and let the current system
collapse of its own weight clearing the way for public acceptance
of single-payer. Critics accused Beilenson of being a "turncoat,"
and sent angry letters to Dean Sommer arguing that the School should
not lend its name to a campaign for anything less than a true single-payer
David Levine, MD, ScD '72, MPH '69, was among the letter writers.
Months later, the Hopkins Medicine internist with a joint appointment
at Public Health says that the coalition's effort is "all to the
good," but adds, "While this would bring improvement, it won't be
sufficient." Improving the current patchwork system will delay what
he says is an inevitable move to single-payer. "We may as well bite
the bullet and do it now. It will be harder to do later."
Sommer, MD, MHS '73, politely accepted the complaints, yet continues
to support the reform effort. "They have taken the highest moral
ground," Sommer says of the critics. "But I believe it's more important
to have universal health care. Half a loaf is better than no loaf
While the coalition's formal State House lobbying has yet to begin,
businesses and insurance companies have been plotting a counterattack
for months. They have their own well-financed coalition, Marylanders
for Responsible Health Care Solutions, which is poised to oppose
any dramatic changes in the state's insurance system.
Bryson Popham, a veteran insurance industry lobbyist who is directing
the group, says his clients fear they have a lot to lose - at least
down the road with a move to universal health coverage. They suspect
a single-payer plan, funded by a tax on employers, remains the ultimate
And that, he says, is anathema.
"One of our central principles is that we believe in incremental
reform," Popham says. "Reform the system we have rather than toss
out the entire system, which is what they would do."
The Initiative comes along at a time when the state is already
struggling to pay its health care bills. The reimbursement rates
for providers in Maryland's Medicaid program are generally considered
to be inadequate, and the state has not provided full funding for
costly areas such as mental health treatment. (Bowing to that reality,
the Initiative tinkered this fall with its insurance proposal to
free up as much as $100 million to increase the current Medicaid
At a Sept. 7 press conference at the School, the Initiative launched
the debate, beginning its campaign to educate the public and lawmakers
about the benefits of universal coverage. Some of the School's faculty
will eventually provide expert testimony to the legislature on the
health insurance proposal, but will remain relatively impartial
and objective. "We'll try to play the policy analyst as best we
can," says Weiner. The coalition's long-range plan hinges on making
universal health care a key issue in Maryland's 2002 gubernatorial
and legislative races. If the group can get pledges of support from
enough winning candidates particularly from the next governor
DeMarco hopes to have a strong chance of success in Annapolis
The bottom line, Oliver suggests, is that only a new political
approach will force dramatic change. "Maryland thinks of itself
as very progressive," he says. "But Maryland has never gotten anywhere
close to universal coverage."